Crowder v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “a hyperlink and language advising [the plaintiff] to click on the hyperlink” may “be used to reasonably communicate a forum selection clause.”
• finding that emails containing a hyperlink and language advising plaintiff to click on the hyperlink sufficiently directed the plaintiff's notice to the terms and conditions
• noting that case would have been “simpler to resolve had [defendant] used a ‘click-wrap’ ' mechanism to provide reasonable notice and to obtain [plaintiffs] assent”
• finding that a hyperlink sent via email linking to the terms and conditions of a vacation tour constituted reasonable communication of a forum selection clause contained in the terms and conditions
• finding terms enforceable where the email containing the \TERMS AND CONDITIONS\ hyperlink directed the plaintiff to read the hyperlinked document
• noting that “underlining the URL” is “a manner distinctive to hyperlinks”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).