Crowder v. Haymaker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering, for example, selection and engagement, the payment of wages, and the power of dismissal
• claimant held to be an independent contractor; no analysis of whether claimant was engaged in defendant’s trade, business, or occupation
• claimant held to be an independent contractor; no analysis of whether claimant was engaged in defendant's trade, business, or occupation
• “[T]he fact that payment may be made by the piece, job, day or hour, is not necessarily controlling. It is but a fact to be considered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).