Skip to main content
· 5/8/1968

Crowder v. Carroll

Citations

  • 161 S.E.2d 235
  • 251 S.C. 192
  • 1968 S.C. LEXIS 151

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting parent’s contention that doctrine did not apply as a matter of law because at time of accident son was driving family vehicle contrary to parent’s express instructions
  • statutes in derogation of common law must be strictly construed and not extended in application beyond clear legislative intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bussey, Moss, Lewis, Brailsford, Littlejohn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.