Crow & Jarvis v. Tinsley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to infer ambiguity in previous version of statute based on subsequent amendment so as to allow vending machine operate to recover refund of amounts allegedly improperly paid for sales tax
• when the Legislature reenacts a statute, it is presumed to know and adopt the construction placed thereon by the state tax administrators
• seller who collected sales tax by law directly from customer had no standing to demand refund

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).