Skip to main content
· 6/17/2003

Crow Creek Tribe v. White, Thomas E.

Citations

  • 331 F.3d 912
  • 356 U.S. App. D.C. 327
  • 33 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20226
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11909
  • 2003 WL 21382907

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a tribe did not have standing to intervene when its statutory right to cultural resources clearly would continue after challenged land transfer
  • finding the “possibility” that the Secretary of the Army would not enforce a statute, despite retaining full enforcement authority and despite the ongoing applicability of the statute, to be “unsupported conjecture” that “does not constitute injury in fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sentelle, Henderson, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.