Crovella v. Cochrane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \[j]urors and courts do not know and are not permitted arbitrarily to say what are the proper methods of diagnosing and treating human ailments\ and that thus, it is the proper subject of expert opinion testimony
• issue of lack of compliance with rule regarding filing of motion for summary judgment and supporting affidavits was not preserved for appellate review in absence of timely objection below

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).