Crout v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where no counteraffidavit is filed, an affidavit presented in accordance with section 18.001 is admissible.”
• “Where no counteraffidavit is filed, an affidavit presented in accordance with section 18.001 is admissible.”
• “A claim for past medical expenses must be supported by evidence that such expenses were reasonable and necessary.”
• “When evaluating whether an expert’s testimony is speculative or conclusory, or whether an expert’s opinion contains fatal analytical gaps, we look to the entire record, not just to the expert’s statements in isolation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).