Crouse v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that while sentencing court may consider “any and all information that reasonably might bear on the proper sentence,” it may not consider “unsubstantiated allegations of misconduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McGill v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-10-10· cited 9×
• Love v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-01-12· cited 8×
• Shelko v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-04-26· cited 5×
• MacIntosh v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-01-08· cited 4×
• Johns v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-05-10

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dawson v. Delaware
  Supreme Court· 1992-03-09· cited 544×
• Reese v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-07-13· cited 21×
• Mayhann v. Mayhann
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2001-11-09· cited 11×
• Dauzat v. State, Department of Transportation & Development
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2010-02-03· cited 3×