Crouse v. Knights Life Insurance Co. of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the “the requested subpoena [under the Walsh Act] is consistent with the liberal discovery contemplated by Rule 26 and is, therefore, necessary in the interest of justice.”
• ruling objecting party cannot sustain burden with boilerplate claims that requested discovery is burdensome
• noting conclusory statements that an injury may occur do not establish good cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).