Crouse-Hinds Company, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. Internorth, Inc., and in Holdings, Inc., Defendants-Counterclaim-Plaintiffs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• tender offeror has standing to challenge a target company’s poison pill
• “Since there is no question that the Exchange Agreement is a contract that was within the powers of the corporation, and since Belden’s rights thereunder would clearly be prejudiced if the relief sought by InterNorth were to be granted, Belden’s presence is required.”
• where contract involving absent third party was basis of a claim in the action, finding the third party’s “presence [was] required” because its “rights [under the contract] would clearly be prejudiced if the relief sought by [one of the parties] were to be granted”
• sale of stock to favored party
• appeal of granting of preliminary injunction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).