Crouch Funeral Home, Inc. v. Crouch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that employee’s impression of compulsion was “too frail and flimsy” to serve as basis for recovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lozano v. Frank DeLuca Construction
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2004-03-10· cited 75×
• Deffenbaugh Industries & Travelers Insurance v. Angus
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1992-07-08· cited 32×
• Arkansas Department of Correction v. Glover
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1991-06-26· cited 12×
• Stewart v. Cosby-parsons Quarter Horse Ranch
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1980-07-02· cited 2×
• Hawthorne v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1979-11-28· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Duke v. Pekin Wood Products Co.
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1954-02-22· cited 20×
• Wilson v. United Auto Workers International Union
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1969-06-02· cited 20×
• Brooks v. Claywell
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1949-10-31· cited 20×
• American Red Cross v. Wilson
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1975-02-24· cited 15×
• Fremont Indem. Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.
  California Court of Appeal· 1977-04-21· cited 10×
• Hughes v. Hooker Bros.
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1964-01-20· cited 9×
• Claim of Lowicki v. National Sugar Refining Co.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1952-12-30· cited 4×