Crossmark, Inc. v. Hazar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Act does not require a summary judgment motion to confirm, modify, or vacate an arbitration award
• holding that a mere mistake of fact or law does not justify a trial court setting aside an arbitration award
• holding that the Act does not require a summary judgment motion to confirm, modify, or vacate an arbitration award
• holding that a mere mistake of fact or law does not justify a trial court setting aside an arbitration award
• holding that a mere mistake of fact or law does not justify a trial court setting aside an arbitration award
• holding that if a party chooses to follow summary judgment procedure rather than the simple motion procedure authorized by the TAA, it assumes the traditional burdens and requirements of summary judgment practice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).