Crosslin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \A violation of the ex post facto clause may not be raised for the first time on appeal.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Puckett v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1996-03-08· cited 109×
• Taylor v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-05-01· cited 66×
• Poole v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2002-04-26· cited 60×
• Hale v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2002-10-11· cited 37×
• Woodberry v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1993-07-09· cited 13×
• Miller v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-12-18· cited 10×
• Simmons v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2003-08-29· cited 9×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2003-02-28· cited 5×
• Chaney v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2004-05-28· cited 1×
• Skipper v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1997-04-18
• Younes Essouiri v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court: CC-19-1562)
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2024-11-08

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Beck v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1981-03-06· cited 434×
• Ex Parte Allred
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1981-01-09· cited 52×
• Ex Parte Potts
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1983-01-07· cited 36×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1980-10-28· cited 19×
• Lane v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1982-02-05· cited 13×