· 3/5/1917
Crossley v. William H. Connolly Co.
Citations
- 90 N.J.L. 238
- 100 A. 228
- 1917 N.J. LEXIS 300
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting movant’s argument that direct certification would be “quicker because it need only be heard by one court” as “[t]hat argument can be made in every case where there is an appeal involving a final judgment of the Bankruptcy Court.”
- rejecting movant’s argument that direct certification would be “quicker because it need only be heard by one court” as “[t]hat argument can be made in every case where there is an appeal involving a final judgment of the Bankruptcy Court.”
- rejecting movant’s argument that direct certification would be “quicker because it need only be heard by one court” as “[t]hat argument can be made in every case where there is an appeal involving a final judgment of the Bankruptcy Court.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Minturn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.