Skip to main content
· 3/5/1917

Crossley v. William H. Connolly Co.

Citations

  • 90 N.J.L. 238
  • 100 A. 228
  • 1917 N.J. LEXIS 300

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting movant’s argument that direct certification would be “quicker because it need only be heard by one court” as “[t]hat argument can be made in every case where there is an appeal involving a final judgment of the Bankruptcy Court.”
  • rejecting movant’s argument that direct certification would be “quicker because it need only be heard by one court” as “[t]hat argument can be made in every case where there is an appeal involving a final judgment of the Bankruptcy Court.”
  • rejecting movant’s argument that direct certification would be “quicker because it need only be heard by one court” as “[t]hat argument can be made in every case where there is an appeal involving a final judgment of the Bankruptcy Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Minturn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.