Skip to main content
· 3/2/1992

Crossley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Citations

  • 415 S.E.2d 393
  • 307 S.C. 354
  • 1992 S.C. LEXIS 56

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding there was no evidence to support claim defendant breached implied covenant of good faith because there was “no bad faith.”
  • holding there was no bad faith when there were reasonable grounds for the insurer to contest a claim
  • finding that insurer breached the insurance contract by denying coverage but was not liable for bad faith because its denial of medical coverage based on an investigation of applicant’s medical history was not unreasonable
  • explaining that, on a directed verdict motion in a contract formation case, this Court views \the evidence and all inferences which may reasonably be drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to [the non-moving party]\
  • reversing judgment for an insured party because the insurer “did not breach its implied covenant of good faith”
  • reversing judgment for an insured party because the insurer “did not breach its implied covenant of good faith”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alexander, Finney, Harwell, Moore, Sanders, Toal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.