Cross v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a protestor’s allegations of bad faith or bias were sufficiently well grounded to warrant supplementation
• explaining that the court should apply the Federal Rules of Evidence to the extra-record materials in order to ensure their reliability
• finding that the Federal Rules of Evidence should be applied to materials that are extra-record supplementation of the AR to ensure their reliability
• explaining that documents which the agency omitted from the administrative record, but should have included in the first place, or are agency-generated, should be included for completeness
• finding that allegations of bias based upon proven exercise of undue influence by Principle Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition was sufficient to require supplementation of the record
• explaining that a plaintiff need only “assert a reasonable factual predicate for such allegation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).