Cross v. Tucker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring that the evidence be “irreconcilable with any reasonable theory of [the defendant’s] innocence and exclude to a moral certainty every hypothesis but that of his guilt”
• requiring that the evidence be “irreconcilable with any reasonable theory of [the defendant’s] innocence and exclude to a moral certainty every hypothesis but that of his guilt”
• requiring that the evidence be “irreconcilable with any reasonable theory of [the defendant’s] innocence and exclude to a moral certainty every hypothesis but that of his guilt”
• state's evidence deemed sufficient to link defendant to a murder and to establish that it was a premeditated murder; first degree murder conviction upheld

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).