Cross v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a defendant has the right to be represented by an attorney at resentencing
• relying on Mullins v. State, 997 So.2d 443 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), to reject State’s argument that striking the minimum mandatory term was merely ministerial where parties and court falsely believed the 10/20/Life minimum mandatory sentence applied
• relying on Mullins v. State, 997 So. 2d 443 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), to reject State’s argument that striking the minimum mandatory term was merely ministerial where parties and court falsely believed the 10/20/Life minimum mandatory sentence applied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jordan v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2014-04-10· cited 45×
• Acosta v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-05· cited 9×
• Murphy v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-22· cited 3×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-05-09· cited 1×
• Tyrone Jordan v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2014-04-10
• McMullon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-01-09

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mullins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-03· cited 16×
• McGough v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-05-18· cited 9×
• Bines v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-02-21· cited 7×