Cross v. Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that argument was improper and incurable where there was no evidence in record to support counsel’s argument that opposing counsel had financial interest in case, went shopping for doctors, and manufactured evidence
• holding that argument was improper and incurable where there was no evidence in record to support counsel’s argument that opposing counsel had financial interest in case, went shopping for doctors, and manufactured evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).