· 1/14/1969
Cross v. Harrington
Citations
- 294 F. Supp. 1340
- 13 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 279
- 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9235
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “all papers” relied on in answering an entire set of interrogatories does not describe the documents with the required “reasonable particularity”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.