Cross v. Division of Highways

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming grant of summary judgment in favor of the university because “mere speculation was insufficient to permit a reasonable inference that NYU’s proffered reasons for [the plaintiff’s adverse employment actions] were illegitimate or, otherwise, pretexts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).