Skip to main content
· 6/27/1996

Cross v. Cunningham

Citations

  • 87 F.3d 586
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 15419
  • 1996 WL 343968

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting Detainer Act claim on habeas review when petitioner made “no claim that the alleged [Detainer Act] violation actually impaired his ability to prepare a defense … .”
  • claim of IAD violation not cognizable in habeas action as IAD provision at issue has nothing to do -with securing a fair trial and there has been no allegation that violation impaired defense or appeal
  • claim of IAD violation not cognizable in habeas action as IAD provision at issue has nothing to do with securing a fair trial and there has been no allegation that violation impaired defense or appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Boudin, Stahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.