Skip to main content
· 4/24/1981

Crosby v. Young

Citations

  • 512 F. Supp. 1363
  • 11 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20
  • 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18044

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing previous challenges to the delegation and holding “the delegation of environmental responsibilities is a matter that Congress considered carefully and provided for with appropriate safeguards .... ”
  • City’s need to obtain commitment of federal funding for a development project by a date certain
  • where an immediate response was required for a city to meet a federal funding deadline for a development project to counteract potentially dire economic effects of the closure of a General Motors plant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feikens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.