Skip to main content
· 6/5/1998

Crosby v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

Citations

  • 711 So. 2d 260
  • 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 6521
  • 1998 WL 288227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if an employee reasonably refuses to perform a required act, the employee is still eligible to receive unemployment compensation benefits
  • finding a reasonable refusal to perform a directive insufficient to support a denial of benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Antoon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.