Crosby v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In the juvenile court the burden is on the State to establish that the juvenile system does not offer a viable chance to the juvenile for rehabilitation, whereas at the circuit court level the burden is on the juvenile to demonstrate he or she is suitable for rehabilitation[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Franklin P.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-18· cited 36×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-06-08· cited 31×
• State v. Buelow
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-12-14· cited 13×
• State v. Hatton
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1994-01-24· cited 9×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-02-28· cited 4×
• Rohrbaugh v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2023-03-31
• Wittwer v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2026-05-01

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kent v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1966-03-22· cited 2,202×
• Long v. Robinson
  D. Maryland· 1970-08-06· cited 50×
• Greene v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-01-29· cited 39×
• Franklin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-01-10· cited 30×
• Long v. Robinson
  Fourth Circuit· 1971-01-18· cited 28×
• Austin v. Director of Patuxent Institution
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1967-01-16· cited 20×
• In Re Appeal No. 961
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-09-24· cited 17×
• Matter of Miles
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1973-10-11· cited 15×
• In Re Glenn S.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-06-01· cited 10×
• In Re Ricky B.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1979-10-17· cited 5×