Crosby v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• subsequent acts were relevant and admissible because they were part of crime spree indicating certain course of conduct
• subsequent acts were relevant and admissible because they were part of crime spree indicating certain course of conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Burgeson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1996-09-09· cited 126×
• Robinson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-07-15· cited 37×
• Beasley v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1998-07-13· cited 26×
• Gadson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1993-12-02· cited 16×
• Moore v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2009-03-09· cited 12×
• Rust v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-12-19· cited 8×
• Ridley v. Grandison
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1990-03-09· cited 6×
• Sams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-09-04· cited 2×
• Corthran v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1999-04-12

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Baxter v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1985-07-03· cited 99×
• Lobdell v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1987-03-12· cited 73×
• Cobb v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1979-09-26· cited 68×
• Gribble v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1981-11-13· cited 17×
• Baker v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1983-03-09· cited 9×