Crosby v. Dodge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a news article was not admissible under this principle because the party offering it waived any argument that it was not feasible to depose the reporter to attest to the article's contents
• explaining that statements putting a “rosy face on an inherently uncertain process” were inactionable, and indeed, “investors would have expected no less”
• stating that, with some exceptions not applicable here, “hearsay is inadmissible in summary • judgment proceedings to the same extent that it is inadmissible in a trial”
• noting that hearsay is inadmissible in summary judgment proceedings save affidavits and depositions
• holding newspaper articles were hearsay and inadmissible for purposes of summary judgment
• holding newspaper articles were hearsay and inadmissible for purposes of summary judgment.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).