Crosby v. America Online, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that while 1367 is ambiguous, the legislative history proves that 1367 was not intended to affect the jurisdictional requirements of 1332
• finding that purported cost to defendant to change its Internet business practices did not satisfy jurisdictional minimum since appropriate methodology for court’s calculation of amount in controversy was to. prorate cost of injunction across the total numbers of plaintiffs
• “Since the Plaintiffs could not have aggregated their separate claims in order to reach this court, AOL may not do so upon removing the case. Otherwise, the holding of Zahn would be rendered meaningless”
• class members' claims not aggregated where suit based on individual contract rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).