Cropper v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• doctrine is “subject to a provision in the contract of sale obligating the vendor to deliver the property in the same condition it was in at the time of the making of the contract, reasonable wear and tear excepted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• County of Lancaster v. Schwarz
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1949-12-12· cited 20×
• Union Cty. Savings Bank v. Johnson
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-02-26· cited 15×
• Sakuma v. Zellerbach Paper Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1938-03-14· cited 14×
• In Re Simmons
  D. New Jersey· 1996-11-01· cited 12×
• Penn Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n v. Joyce
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1962-07-05· cited 10×
• Gallicchio v. Jarzla
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1952-02-25· cited 9×
• Midfirst Bank v. Graves
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2007-08-24· cited 3×
• Casino Reinvestment Development Authority v. City of Atlantic City
  New Jersey Tax Court· 1999-11-15· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Travellers' Insurance v. Connecticut
  Supreme Court· 1902-05-05· cited 93×
• Woodworth v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance
  Supreme Court· 1902-05-05· cited 14×
• Vance's administrator v. Foster & Ray
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1872-03-24· cited 7×
• Carpenter v. Shanley
  New Jersey Court of Chancery· 1909-04-20· cited 3×