· 1/29/2004
Cropp v. Williams
Citations
- 841 A.2d 328
- 2004 D.C. App. LEXIS 35
- 2004 WL 169806
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- citation 3 Bright Ideas further stated that it never received a refund check from the District, a claim renewed at oral argument. We need not resolve this factual dispute, however, as the status of the District’s refund check does not affect our analysis. 8 omitted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Farrell, Ruiz, Nebeker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.