Skip to main content
· 1/29/2004

Cropp v. Williams

Citations

  • 841 A.2d 328
  • 2004 D.C. App. LEXIS 35
  • 2004 WL 169806

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • citation 3 Bright Ideas further stated that it never received a refund check from the District, a claim renewed at oral argument. We need not resolve this factual dispute, however, as the status of the District’s refund check does not affect our analysis. 8 omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farrell, Ruiz, Nebeker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.