Skip to main content
· 5/4/1891

Crooks v. Miller

Citations

  • 89 Cal. 35
  • 26 P. 615
  • 1891 Cal. LEXIS 762

Syllabus

<p>Order Granting New Trial — Discretion — Presumption upon Appeal. — Every presumption will be indulged in favor of the proper exercise, by the trial court, of its judicial discretion in granting a new trial upon the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to support the decision, and the order will not be reversed, unless there is a manifest abuse of discretion.</p> <p>Id. — Conflicting Evidence. —Where there is a substantial conflict in the evidence, an order granting a new trial on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the decision will not be reversed.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that OCGA § 5-6-35 does not require a discretionary application to appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside to correct clerical error pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-60 (g), even though OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8
  • holding that OCGA § 5-6-35 does not require a discretionary application to appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside to correct clerical error pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-60 (g), even though OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.