Crooks v. Mabus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that the agency allegedly did not consider the plaintiff's submissions when the record contained the submissions and the agency referenced the submissions in its final decision
• rejecting argument that the agency allegedly did not consider the plaintiff’s submissions when the record contained the submissions and the agency referenced the submissions in its final decision
• “[I]t is not necessary for the [agency] to cite explicitly and explain away every point raised”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).