Skip to main content
· 4/4/1988

Crooker v. Van Higgins

Citations

  • 682 F. Supp. 1274
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2840
  • 1988 WL 29289

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[D]istrict court judges on a de novo review of a magistrate’s report and recommendation may entirely ignore arguments not presented to the magistrate.”
  • “[D]istrict court judges on a de novo review of a magistrate’s report and recommendation may entirely ignore arguments not presented to the magistrate.”
  • “[A] party’s written objections . . . must be specific, concise and supported by legal arguments and citations to the record. Broad, yet unsupported objections will not be permitted . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Freedman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.