Crooker v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a per se rule that fee-splitting is unenforceable and finding that claimant who earned a base salary of $80,000 was able to afford the costs of arbitration
• Legislature is presumed to have intended a consistent body of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).