Crook v. Crook

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court was required to make certain written findings of fact even if the deviation from the presumptive amount of child support is based on “shared custody”
• presumption of regularity does not apply where trial court failed to make written findings mandated by statute
• final order reversed where “the superior court awarded a discretionary downward deviation in the amount of child support, but failed to comply with the appropriate statutory requirements,” including OCGA § 19-6-15 (m) (1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Black v. Ferlingere
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-09-21· cited 14×
• Noble v. Noble.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-05-18· cited 1×
• Heintz v. Heintz
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-05-15· cited 1×
• In Re the Estate of Shaun A. Jenkins Jr. Adult Ward
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-02-16
• Jason S. Williams v. Stephanie Williams
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2022-03-02
• Jennifer C. Perrie v. Michael S. Sticher
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2023-01-25

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Spurlock v. Department of Human Resources
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-02-15· cited 65×