· 2/19/2002
Cronin v. Zurich American Insurance
Citations
- 189 F. Supp. 2d 29
- 27 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1976
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2492
- 2002 WL 244605
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The clause is not ambiguous, as plaintiffs argue, and it is not capable of ‘more than one meaning when viewed objectively by a reasonably intelligent person who has examined the context of the entire integrated agreement’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hellerstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.