Cronin v. Strayer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defining interlocutory order as \[a]n order that relates to some intermediate matter in the case; any order other than a final order\
• medical peer review committee’s records were considered a subject of discovery in a physician’s defamation action against another physician who reported him to committee
• trial court judges are “in the best position to weigh fairly the competing needs and interests of parties affected by discovery” [citation omitted]
• ”[T]he trial court is in the best position to weigh fairly the competing needs and interests of parties affected by discovery”
• “[T]he trial court is in the best position to weigh fairly the competing needs and interests of parties affected by discovery”
• interlocutory discovery orders are not appealable; review may be obtained on appeal from judgment of contempt for refusal to comply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).