Cronin v. Cronin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “To demonstrate a violation of the KCPA in the context of an insurance claim, the insured must show more than a mere failure to settle a claim.”
• pollution exclusion which did not specify whether it applied only to acts of insured but also to acts of third parties held ambiguous “[a]s applied to the facts of this case,” which involved discharge by third party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).