Croner, H. v. Popovich, S.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Serfass and Foulks foreclose this argument
• affirming denial of role adjustment and explaining purchase and sale of a drug is “part and parcel of a drug conspiracy”
• “Under [plain-error] (or any) standard, [defendant] doesn’t overcome the rebuttable presumption of reasonableness of a within-guideline sentence like his.” (citation omitted)
• discussing “extrapolation” approach in Betancourt, 422 F.3d at 246–48

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).