Cromwell's heirs v. Mason's heirs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no error when a disability board did not follow the actions of the VA, which had assigned the servicemember separate ratings for fibromyalgia and depression without addressing pyramiding
• “The court reviews the PDBR decision under a standard ... [that does] not disturb the decision of the [board] unless it is arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law, or unsupported by substantial evidence.”
• “The court reviews the ... decision under a standard ... [that does] not disturb the decision of the [board] unless it is arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law, or unsupported by substantial evidence.”
• “The PDBR reviewed plaintiffs case de novo.” (citing DoDI 6040.44 t4.b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).