Skip to main content
· 7/31/1991

Cromwell Associates v. Oliver Cromwell Owners, Inc.

Citations

  • 941 F.2d 107
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 17684
  • 1991 WL 139871

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “absurd” to require clinic to foretell which individuals will, in concert with named and served parties, violate injunction, and insist on proper service of order to those individuals as prerequisite to holding them in contempt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Altimari, Glasser, Mahoney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.