Skip to main content
· 7/9/2004

Cromer-Kendall v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 326 F. Supp. 2d 50
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13039
  • 94 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 719
  • 2004 WL 1568013

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding plaintiff’s actions to prevent future harassment reasonable where she reported harassment to several individuals with authority over the alleged harasser but did not file formal complaint until later
  • denying summary judgment .where employer knew of disruptive conduct but did not investigate
  • discussing the factual background of the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.