Cromeans v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A conviction in which the sentence is suspended is not such a final conviction as will support an enhancement of punishment, unless the suspension has been revoked.”
• “A conviction in which the sentence is suspended is not such a final conviction as will support an enhancement of punishment, unless the suspension has been revoked.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rummel v. Estelle
  Supreme Court· 1980-03-18· cited 2,234×
• Earhart v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-09-18· cited 140×
• David A. Davis v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
  Fifth Circuit· 1976-03-24· cited 73×
• William James Rummel v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent
  Fifth Circuit· 1978-12-20· cited 57×
• Balli v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-12-03· cited 55×
• Melvin Tanzer v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1960-05-31· cited 16×
• State v. Carlyle
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-03-13· cited 15×
• State v. Albe
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-11-13· cited 3×
• Paul Lewis Hayes v. Donald E. Bordenkircher, Superintendent, Kentucky State Penitentiary
  Sixth Circuit· 1980-05-29
• Gary Jay McCoy v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2015-04-16
• McCoy, Gary Jay
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2015-06-18
• Westerman, John Dewayne
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2018-10-24