Croixland Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Corcoran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “a complaint may contain alternative theories, and if one of the theories can survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, the district court cannot dismiss the complaint”
• “[I] f one of the theories can survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, the district court cannot dismiss the complaint.”
• “[I]t suffices that the statements at issue lead the listener to conclude that the speaker is referring to the plaintiff by description[.]”
• “[I] f one of the theories can survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, the district court cannot dismiss the complaint.”
• “[I]f one of the theories can survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, the district court cannot dismiss the complaint.”
• “ ‘the owners of the Hudson greyhound facility are connected to organized crime’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).