Croft Ex Rel. Estate of Croft v. Old Republic Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a fronting policy did not transform the company into a self-insurer, requiring an offer of UIM coverage, because the company did not file proof of financial responsibility as required.under state law
• holding whether a meaningful offer was made depends on the facts and circumstances of a particular case
• holding whether a meaningful offer was made depends on the facts and circumstances of a particular case
• stating that a fronting policy does not make the policyholder a self-insurer under the state UIM law because the legislature “has not defined such policies as a form of self-insurance”
• stating “[wjhether a meaningful offer was made depends on the facts and circumstances of a particular case”
• stating \[w]hether a meaningful offer was made depends on the facts and circumstances of a particular case\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).