Crofford v. Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. (In Re Crofford)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that due process under Section 105 of the Bankruptcy Code requires “notice and an opportunity to respond”
• holding that Bankruptcy Court “failed to provide notice of its intent to impose sanctions pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 105”
• “[T]he imposition of sanctions should be limited to the authority pursuant to which notice of the possibility of sanctions was issued.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).