Croessant v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a breach of warranty claim failed where the goods “conformed to the warranties”
• holding that a breach of warranty claim failed where the goods “conformed to the warranties”
• holding that a breach of warranty claim failed where the goods “conformed to the warranties”
• lost profits damages “must be proven with reasonable certainty,” and “exact precision is not required” so long as the evidence “provides a reasonable basis for assessing damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).