Crocs Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Cherif Robert Medawar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Congress did not validly abrogate states’ sovereign immunity from suits for money damages in enacting FMLA’s self-care provision
• holding that Congress lacked authority to abrogate states’ sovereign immunity for claims relating to FMLA’s self-care provision
• holding that Congress lacked the authority to abrogate state sovereign immunity when it legislated certain provisions of the FMLA
• holding that there was an insufficient nexus “between self-care leave and gender discrimination by state employers” to validly abrogate state sovereign immunity
• holding that the FMLA’s self-care provisions, as opposed to its family-care provisions, do not validly abrogate sovereign immunity
• holding that Congress lacked authority to abrogate states’ sovereign immunity for claims relating to FMLA’s self-care provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).