Skip to main content

Crockett v. State

Citations

  • 840 S.W.2d 160
  • 1992 Tex. App. LEXIS 2778
  • 1992 WL 309865

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because the state affirmatively waived reliance upon allegations pleaded in the original motion, it could not then rely upon the original motion at the revocation hearing
  • finding an amended motion to revoke, filed after the expiration of the probationary period, to be void
  • because State affirmatively waived reliance upon allegations pleaded in original motion, it could not then rely upon original motion at revocation hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Connor, Duggan, Dunn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.