Skip to main content
· 11/1/1993

Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. Wilson

Citations

  • 864 S.W.2d 244
  • 314 Ark. 578
  • 1993 Ark. LEXIS 609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \finality for purposes of appeal is closely related to finality for purposes of res judicata\
  • collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion, bars relitigation of issues, law or fact, actually litigated in the first suit
  • collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion, bars relitigation of issues, law or fact, actually litigated in the first suit
  • issue preclusion precludes the relitigation of factual issues that were actually litigated and determined in a prior action and which were essential to the prior judgment
  • under Arkansas law, appeal does not suspend preclusive effects

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newbern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.